# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `bpfland` with slightly better average FPS compared to `bpfland-next`. * **Smoothest FPS**: `bpfland-next` with marginally lower standard deviation and variance in FPS. * **Best overall**: `bpfland-next`, as it offers smooth performance with minimal FPS fluctuations while maintaining almost the same mean FPS. # Summary The benchmark compares the `bpfland` and `bpfland-next` schedulers on `CachyOS` using the same hardware and configurations. Both schedulers performed similarly in terms of average FPS, but `bpfland-next` demonstrated better overall stability with more consistent frametimes, resulting in slightly smoother performance. Despite minor differences in FPS metrics, the `bpfland-next` scheduler appears to offer a preferable balance between stability and speed for this particular workload.