Top runs:

• Highest FPS: bpfland with slightly better average FPS compared to bpfland-next.
• Smoothest FPS: bpfland-next with marginally lower standard deviation and variance in FPS.
• Best overall: bpfland-next, as it offers smooth performance with minimal FPS fluctuations while maintaining almost the same mean FPS.

Summary

The benchmark compares the bpfland and bpfland-next schedulers on CachyOS using the same hardware and configurations. Both schedulers performed similarly in terms of average FPS, but bpfland-next demonstrated better overall stability with more consistent frametimes, resulting in slightly smoother performance. Despite minor differences in FPS metrics, the bpfland-next scheduler appears to offer a preferable balance between stability and speed for this particular workload.