# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `default` offers the highest average FPS which is around 3% higher than the other runs, indicating strong performance. * **Smoothest FPS**: `lavd` has the smoothest FPS with a variance in frame time approximately 25% lower than others, suggesting more consistent frame rates. * **Best overall**: `default` provides a balance of high FPS and acceptable FPS smoothness, making it preferable for overall performance. # Issues: * The run with `lavd` provides significantly lower FPS, approximately 8% less than others, and also shows a lower GPU load, indicating potentially reduced utilization of available GPU resources. # Summary This benchmark compared the performance effects of different Rust schedulers using `bpfland`, `default`, and `lavd` schedulers on the same hardware configuration. Among the runs, the `default` scheduler achieved the highest FPS while also maintaining adequate stability, making it the best overall choice. Meanwhile, the `lavd` scheduler, while having the smoothest FPS, exhibited notably lower frame rates, potentially underutilizing the GPU. Both `bpfland` and `default` performed closely in terms of FPS, but the latter edged out due to better consistency and higher average FPS. The results suggest that choosing the right scheduler can lead to noticeable differences in gaming performance.