Benchmark #102

Download
Overwatch 2, Testing BPFLAND values against LAVD-BORE-RUSTY

Load = Youtube 1080p30 in the background (only audio since playback stops when out of focus) Twitch stream 1080p60fps, keeps playing and increases CPU usage by about 20-30% Discord call Same mouse motions in all the instances to increase interactivity

Submitted 9 months ago by aarrayy

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
BORE-5.2.6 Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor 12 GB 6.10.1-2-cachyos
BPFLAND-default Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor 12 GB 6.10.1-2-cachyos
BPFLAND-lag-minus-500 Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor 12 GB 6.10.1-2-cachyos
BPFLAND-lag-minus-1000 Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor 12 GB 6.10.1-2-cachyos
BPFLAND-lag-minus-2000 Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor 12 GB 6.10.1-2-cachyos
BPFLAND-lag-minus-3000 Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor 12 GB 6.10.1-2-cachyos
BPFLAND-lag-minus-4000 Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor 12 GB 6.10.1-2-cachyos
BPFLAND-maxslice-1000 Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor 12 GB 6.10.1-2-cachyos
BPFLAND-maxslice-2000 Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor 12 GB 6.10.1-2-cachyos
LAVD Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor 12 GB 6.10.1-2-cachyos
RUSTY Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor 12 GB 6.10.1-2-cachyos

Top runs

  • Highest FPS: BPFLAND-lag-minus-3000 with the highest average FPS among the runs.
  • Smoothest FPS: BORE-5.2.6 with the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS.
  • Best overall: BPFLAND-lag-minus-3000 offers the highest FPS with acceptable stability compared to other runs with slightly better stability but significantly lower FPS.

Issues

  • BPFLAND-default has significantly lower FPS compared to others, by at least 15% on average.
  • BPFLAND-lag-minus-1000 and BPFLAND-lag-minus-4000 show lower stability with higher variance in FPS compared to others by 60% and 50% respectively.

Summary

The benchmark data shows varying performance across different configuration runs. Runs such as BPFLAND-default, BPFLAND-lag-minus-1000, and BPFLAND-lag-minus-4000 stand out with significant issues in FPS stability and lower performance. Among the rest, BPFLAND-lag-minus-3000 delivers the highest FPS, while BORE-5.2.6 offers the smoothest experience with the least variability in frame rates. Overall, the setup conditions like GPU, CPU, and kernel version are consistent across the runs, suggesting the differences are configuration-specific rather than hardware-related.