# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `bpfland` and comment * **Smoothest FPS**: `lavd` and comment * **Best overall**: `bpfland` and comment # Issues: * The configuration using the `flash` scheduler had an FPS mean significantly lower by approximately 6% compared to other configurations. * The configuration utilizing the `lavd` scheduler underperformed with an FPS mean approximately 9% lower than the top performer. # Summary The benchmark results of various Rust scheduler configurations running on a consistent hardware setup indicate that the `bpfland` configuration achieved the highest average FPS, making it the best-performing setup overall, despite not having the smoothest frame rate. Meanwhile, the `lavd` scheduler demonstrated the smoothest frame delivery but came at the cost of lower overall FPS. Two configurations, `flash` and `lavd`, showed considerable reductions in FPS mean, illustrating variances in performance related to scheduler choice alone, as all runs used the same hardware and system configurations.