Benchmark #1044

Download
osu!stable + stress-ng - bpfland stuff

Submitted 2 months ago by .dnaim

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
bpfland-default Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon Graphics AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Creator Edition 14 GB 6.13.0-3-cachyos powersave
bpfland-k Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon Graphics AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Creator Edition 14 GB 6.13.0-3-cachyos powersave
bpfland-p-k Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon Graphics AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Creator Edition 14 GB 6.13.0-3-cachyos powersave
bpfland-p Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon Graphics AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Creator Edition 14 GB 6.13.0-3-cachyos powersave
bpfland Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon Graphics AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Creator Edition 14 GB 6.13.0-3-cachyos powersave
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `bpfland` with the highest average FPS. * **Smoothest FPS**: `bpfland` with the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS. * **Best overall**: `bpfland` as it combines the highest FPS with smooth performance. # Issues: * The run using the configuration labeled with `bpfland-k` and `bpfland-p-k` shows significantly lower average FPS compared to others, more than 35% inferior. * High variability in FPS is observed for the `bpfland-k` and `bpfland-p-k` configurations, resulting in a less stable gaming experience. # Summary This benchmark compares various configurations of the `bpfland` system using the `powersave` scheduler on `Steam Runtime 3 (sniper)` with an `AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Creator Edition` CPU and `AMD Radeon Graphics` GPU. Among these, the default `bpfland` configuration provided the highest and most stable FPS, making it the ideal choice for gaming purposes in this context. Meanwhile, the `bpfland-k` and `bpfland-p-k` configurations struggled with lower performance and higher variability, likely due to different scheduling strategies or other possible non-visible differences in implementations.