# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `bpfland-next-default-n` with an average FPS that is around 1% higher compared to others. * **Smoothest FPS**: `bpfland-next-n` with the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS, approximately 2% more stable than others. * **Best overall**: `bpfland-next-default-n`, as it offers the highest FPS, coupled with acceptable stability, making it the optimal choice. # Summary In this benchmark, four configurations of the `bpfland-next` were tested using an AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS processor and AMD Radeon graphics. All runs utilized `Steam Runtime 3` on `powersave` scheduler of the `Linux kernel 6.13.0-3-cachyos`. The `bpfland-next-default-n` version demonstrated a slightly superior average FPS, while the `bpfland-next-n` provided the most stability in FPS. The configurations were similar across all runs, featuring identical hardware and environmental settings, indicating that any differences in performance are likely attributable to the parameters unique to each test.