Benchmark #1056

Download
osu!stable + stress-ng - lavd testing

Submitted 1 month ago by .dnaim

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
bpfland-pr Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon Graphics AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Creator Edition 14 GB 6.13.0-3-cachyos powersave
lavd-good Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon Graphics AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Creator Edition 14 GB 6.13.0-3-cachyos powersave
lavd-pr-normal Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon Graphics AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Creator Edition 14 GB 6.13.0-3-cachyos powersave
lavd-pr Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon Graphics AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Creator Edition 14 GB 6.13.0-3-cachyos powersave
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `lavd-good` with an average FPS surpassing others by more than 5%. * **Smoothest FPS**: `lavd-good` with the lowest standard deviation and variance, indicating more stable frame rates. * **Best overall**: `lavd-good`, as it provides both the highest average FPS and the smoothest experience compared to other runs. # Issues: * Two runs, those using `bpfland` and `lavd-pr-normal`, exhibited significantly lower average FPS compared to the others, up to 30% lower than the best-performing run, indicating performance issues. * The `lavd-pr-normal` and `lavd-pr` runs have a high standard deviation in FPS, indicating variability in the frame rates which could lead to noticeable stuttering or jitter during gameplay. * It's noteworthy that despite using the same hardware and software configuration, the performance of `lavd-pr` and `lavd-pr-normal` runs is much worse, suggesting possible optimization issues or configuration problems not related directly to the hardware or OS. # Summary This benchmark compares different versions or configurations under `Steam Runtime 3 (sniper)`, using the same hardware setup which includes the AMD Radeon GPU and Ryzen 5 6600HS CPU. The focus is likely on evaluating different `lavd` configurations or optimizations. The run tagged `lavd-good` stands out as the top performer, delivering the highest and most stable FPS. However, some configurations showed significant detriments in both performance and stability, suggesting potential areas for improvement in the `lavd` setup or optimizations. Despite the identical hardware and OS, these differences highlight the impact of software tuning on performance outcomes.