# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `lavd` with approximately 1% higher average FPS compared to `bpfland`. * **Smoothest FPS**: `bpfland` with 3% lower standard deviation and variance in FPS. * **Best overall**: `bpfland`, due to smoother FPS performance despite slightly lower average FPS. # Issues: * The `lavd` run had a higher swap usage, indicating potential memory management inefficiency unrelated to the benchmark comparison. # Summary This benchmark compares the performance of the `scx_bpfland` and `scx_lavd` schedulers using a consistent hardware and software setup. Both schedulers demonstrated high overall performance, but `scx_bpfland` showed smoother FPS performance, making it the more stable choice despite `scx_lavd` slightly edging in terms of average FPS. However, `scx_lavd` displayed a significant increase in swap usage, potentially affecting system stability under extensive loads. Overall, `scx_bpfland` would be preferred for a more stable gaming experience in this scenario.