Benchmark #1075

Download
isonzo -- Rust schedulers 37

Submitted 1 month ago by cuysaurus

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
bore Steam Runtime 2 (soldier) AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT (RADV NAVI23) Intel Core i5-10600K CPU @ 4.10GHz 17 GB 6.13.1-2-cachyos performance
bpfland Steam Runtime 2 (soldier) AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT (RADV NAVI23) Intel Core i5-10600K CPU @ 4.10GHz 17 GB 6.13.1-2-cachyos performance
lavd Steam Runtime 2 (soldier) AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT (RADV NAVI23) Intel Core i5-10600K CPU @ 4.10GHz 17 GB 6.13.1-2-cachyos performance
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `bore` with approximately 10% higher average FPS than the next best run, making it the top performer in terms of raw frame rate. * **Smoothest FPS**: `lavd` with the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS, resulting in the smoothest overall gaming experience. * **Best overall**: `bore` as it offers the balance of high performance with reasonable smoothness, having slightly higher FPS with acceptable stability. # Issues: * The run with the `lavd` scheduler has approximately 10% lower average FPS compared to the highest performer, indicating a compromise in performance for smoother frame rates. # Summary In this benchmark comparing the performance of different Rust schedulers using a consistent hardware and software setup, the `bore` scheduler provided the highest average FPS, making it the most suitable for users prioritizing performance. However, the `lavd` scheduler, though maintaining the lowest FPS among the three, demonstrated the lowest frame rate variability, offering a smoother experience. The `bpfland` scheduler, while positioned between the two in terms of both FPS and smoothness, did not excel in either metric significantly.