Benchmark #1088

Download
isonzo -- Rust schedulers 38

Submitted 3 weeks ago by cuysaurus

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
bpfland Steam Runtime 2 (soldier) AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT (RADV NAVI23) Intel Core i5-10600K CPU @ 4.10GHz 17 GB 6.13.2-2-cachyos performance
default Steam Runtime 2 (soldier) AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT (RADV NAVI23) Intel Core i5-10600K CPU @ 4.10GHz 17 GB 6.13.2-2-cachyos performance
lavd Steam Runtime 2 (soldier) AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT (RADV NAVI23) Intel Core i5-10600K CPU @ 4.10GHz 17 GB 6.13.2-2-cachyos performance
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `lavd` with around 20% higher average FPS compared to the `default` run, showcasing the best performance in terms of frames per second. * **Smoothest FPS**: `bpfland` with the lowest standard deviation and variance, indicating more consistent frame delivery compared to others. * **Best overall**: `bpfland`, balancing high FPS and smoothness of frame delivery, outperforming significantly both in consistency and close to `lavd` in FPS. # Issues: * The `default` run shows approximately 15% lower FPS and higher frame time variability compared to other runs, indicating a less optimal scheduling strategy for this setup. # Summary In this benchmark of the game "isonzo," using the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT GPU and an Intel Core i5-10600K CPU, the performance was tested with different Rust schedulers using the `performance` Linux kernel scheduler. The runs employing the `bpfland` and `lavd` schedulers significantly outperformed the traditional `default` scheduler, with the `lavd` scheduler offering the highest FPS. However, the `bpfland` scheduler provided the smoothest frame experience with the lowest variability, making it the best overall choice. This highlights the potential benefits of using advanced Rust schedulers for gaming under similar hardware configurations.