# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` with an average FPS approximately 4% higher than `lavd`. * **Smoothest FPS**: `lavd` because it has a standard deviation of FPS about 26% lower than `BORE`. * **Best overall**: `lavd` as it offers a smoother experience with approximately 26% less variability in FPS, despite having a slightly lower average FPS. # Summary This benchmark compares two Linux scheduler configurations, focusing on `BORE` and `lavd` schedulers running the osu!stable game alongside stress-ng tests. Both configurations use the same hardware setup with identical OS and drivers. `BORE` delivers a higher average FPS compared to `lavd`, however, `lavd` provides a more stable and consistent gaming experience with significantly lower FPS variance. While GPU performance metrics such as load, temperature, and power usage were relatively similar, the main distinction lies in the smoother frame delivery of `lavd`, making it preferable for consistent performance.