Benchmark #109

Download
osu!stable + ffmpeg - BORE 5.2.6 vs lavd main + scx/#456 + scx/#457 vs bpfland-next

Submitted 1 month ago by .dnaim

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
osu!stable-BORE CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU/PCIe/SSE2 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Creator Edition 14 GB 6.10.2-2-cachyos powersave
osu!stable-lavd-patched CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU/PCIe/SSE2 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Creator Edition 14 GB 6.10.2-2-cachyos powersave
osu!stable-bpfland-next CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU/PCIe/SSE2 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Creator Edition 14 GB 6.10.2-2-cachyos powersave
### Top runs - **Highest FPS**: `osu!stable-lavd-patched` with an average of 543.74 FPS. - **Smoothest FPS**: `osu!stable-lavd-patched` with the lowest standard deviation of FPS at 114.97. - **Best overall**: `osu!stable-lavd-patched` offers both the highest average FPS and the smoothest experience. ### Issues - **osu!stable-bpfland-next** shows significantly lower average FPS (450.61 FPS) compared to the other two runs, with a variance nearly double and the highest standard deviation. Given that the hardware and software are identical across all runs, this indicates an issue with FPS stability. ### Summary All three benchmark runs were performed with identical hardware and software configurations, providing an even ground for comparison. `osu!stable-lavd-patched` stood out as the best run, offering the highest average FPS and smoothest performance. On the other hand, `osu!stable-bpfland-next` had significantly lower FPS and higher variability, suggesting potential instability or inefficiency within that configuration. The `osu!stable-BORE` run performed well, but was slightly edged out by `osu!stable-lavd-patched` in terms of both average FPS and stability. Overall, `osu!stable-lavd-patched` is the clear winner in providing the best gaming experience.