# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` achieves the highest average FPS, outperforming the others by a considerable percentage. * **Smoothest FPS**: `lavd` has the smoothest FPS with the lowest standard deviation and variance among the runs. * **Best overall**: `lavd` is the best overall choice, balancing high FPS and remarkably low variance, offering a smooth performance experience. # Issues: * The `bpfland` run has a significantly lower FPS compared to the others, indicating potential performance issues with this configuration. # Summary The benchmark compares the performance of different implementations, specifically `lavd`, `bpfland`, and `BORE`, on a consistent hardware and software setup. Notably, `BORE` leads with the highest FPS, showing an advantage in raw performance capabilities. Meanwhile, `lavd` provides a more stable experience with the smoothest FPS, indicating optimal stability. The `bpfland` configuration lags significantly behind in terms of FPS, pointing towards potential inefficiencies or limitations in this setup. All tests were run on the same AMD GPU and CPU setup using the `Steam Runtime 3` and `Linux powersave` scheduler, ensuring a fair comparison.