# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `default` with an average FPS about 1% higher than the other runs. * **Smoothest FPS**: `lavd` with the lowest standard deviation in FPS, indicating smoother performance. * **Best overall**: `bpfland` as it offers a balance with slightly lower FPS than `default` but with better stability compared to `default`, making it a solid choice. # Issues: * The `lavd` configuration shows approximately 4-5% lower average FPS compared to the other configurations, which might point to inefficiencies in its performance under this specific setup. # Summary In this benchmark comparing different Rust runtime schedulers under the `Steam Runtime 2` environment using a consistent hardware setup, the `default` configuration demonstrated the highest FPS. However, the `bpfland` configuration offered the best overall balance with reasonable FPS and better stability compared to `lavd`, which although had the smoothest FPS, lagged behind in performance. These results highlight the variability in performance tuning based on scheduler implementations under identical hardware conditions, showcasing the need for careful selection based on desired performance characteristics.