# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `lavd-dispatch-eager` and it has slightly higher average FPS than the other run. * **Smoothest FPS**: `lavd` and it has a marginally lower standard deviation and variance of FPS. * **Best overall**: `lavd-dispatch-eager` as it balances higher FPS with a slight compromise in smoothness. # Summary This benchmark compares the performance of two `lavd` configurations using the same hardware setup, focusing on different dispatch techniques. Both runs used the same Linux kernel version and scheduler, suggesting the main difference lies in how tasks are dispatched. The `lavd-dispatch-eager` run shows a slight advantage in FPS, making it the better choice for scenarios where maximum performance is desired. However, the `lavd` configuration offers smoother performance, ideal for applications demanding consistency over peak FPS. Both configurations demonstrate high efficiency with maximum CPU and GPU load, but their subtle differences highlight variations in thermal management and resource allocation.