# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BPFLAND-S-500-s-2000-l-2000`, achieving the highest average framerate with a margin over the other runs. * **Smoothest FPS**: `BPFLAND-k`, demonstrating the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS, indicating the most stable performance. * **Best overall**: `BPFLAND-S-500-s-2000-l-2000`, balancing a high average FPS and a competitive stability across the tested configurations. # Issues: * The specific benchmark configurations using the `-p` or `-n` flags do not reach the same performance levels in terms of FPS or stability compared to other configurations tested. # Summary The benchmarking of different `bpf_land` configurations for "Overwatch 2" under a consistent hardware and software setup reveals how different settings can affect performance. The use of different `bpf_land` flags shows varying outcomes, with the `bpf_land-S-500-s-2000-l-2000` configuration providing the best results in terms of average FPS, while `bpf_land-k` produced the smoothest gameplay experience. Certain configurations with `-p` or `-n` flags showed limitations in both performance and stability, indicating these may not be optimal for high-demand scenarios on this hardware. Overall, it illustrates the impact small config changes can have on performance with the utilized AMD hardware under Linux's `performance` scheduler and `Steam Runtime 3`.