# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `p2dq` with approximately 2% higher mean FPS than the other runs. * **Smoothest FPS**: `p2dq` with the lowest standard deviation and variance, indicating the most stable FPS. * **Best overall**: `p2dq` due to its combination of the highest average FPS and the smoothest frame rates. # Summary This benchmark compares three Rust scheduler implementations—`bore`, `bpfland`, and `p2dq`—on a system running the Steam Runtime with an AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT GPU and an Intel Core i5-10600K CPU. All runs were conducted with the same hardware and software configurations, focusing on maximizing performance with the performance Linux scheduler. The `p2dq` scheduler demonstrated superior performance with the highest mean FPS and the smoothest frame rate, making it the most optimal choice for this setup. The other schedulers, `bore` and `bpfland`, performed comparably but had slightly lower performance metrics compared to `p2dq`.