Benchmark #1320

Download
isonzo -- Rust schedulers 46

Submitted 2 weeks ago by cuysaurus

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
bpfland Steam Runtime 2 (soldier) AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT (RADV NAVI23) Intel Core i5-10600K CPU @ 4.10GHz 17 GB 6.14.2-2-cachyos performance
bpfland_pw Steam Runtime 2 (soldier) AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT (RADV NAVI23) Intel Core i5-10600K CPU @ 4.10GHz 17 GB 6.14.2-2-cachyos performance
lavd Steam Runtime 2 (soldier) AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT (RADV NAVI23) Intel Core i5-10600K CPU @ 4.10GHz 17 GB 6.14.2-2-cachyos performance
p2dq_1 Steam Runtime 2 (soldier) AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT (RADV NAVI23) Intel Core i5-10600K CPU @ 4.10GHz 17 GB 6.14.2-2-cachyos performance
p2dq_50 Steam Runtime 2 (soldier) AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT (RADV NAVI23) Intel Core i5-10600K CPU @ 4.10GHz 17 GB 6.14.2-2-cachyos performance
p2dq_99 Steam Runtime 2 (soldier) AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT (RADV NAVI23) Intel Core i5-10600K CPU @ 4.10GHz 17 GB 6.14.2-2-cachyos performance
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `p2dq_99` with a slightly higher mean FPS compared to other runs. * **Smoothest FPS**: `bpfland`, exhibiting the lowest standard deviation and variance among the FPS values. * **Best overall**: `p2dq_99` due to combining relatively high FPS with low variation. # Summary In this benchmark comparing different Rust schedulers such as `scx_bpfland` and `p2dq` variants, it's evident that the `p2dq_99` configuration provides the best overall performance, balancing high FPS with moderate stability. Although `p2dq_50` offers competitive FPS, its higher variability indicates occasional performance fluctuations. On the other hand, `bpfland` provided the smoothest gameplay experience, though with slightly lower FPS compared to the best overall choice. All other variables such as hardware, OS, and kernel version remained constant, ensuring a fair comparison across configurations.