Benchmark #133

Download
osu!stable + ffmpeg - lavd vs bpfland vs bpfland preempt off

Submitted 3 months ago by .dnaim

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
osu!stable-lavd CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU/PCIe/SSE2 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Creator Edition 14 GB 6.10.2-1-cachyos-testing powersave
osu!stable-bpfland CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU/PCIe/SSE2 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Creator Edition 14 GB 6.10.2-1-cachyos-testing powersave
osu!stable-bpfland-preempt-off CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU/PCIe/SSE2 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Creator Edition 14 GB 6.10.2-1-cachyos-testing powersave
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `osu!stable-lavd` delivers the highest average FPS with approximately 14% higher than the next best run. * **Smoothest FPS**: `osu!stable-lavd` stands out as the smoothest run with the lowest variance and standard deviation in FPS, indicating a more consistent performance. * **Best overall**: `osu!stable-lavd` due to its combination of the highest average FPS and the lowest variance, making it the top performer among the runs. # Issues: * The run with `osu!stable-bpfland` has roughly 12% lower average FPS than `osu!stable-lavd`, coupled with a significant 127% higher FPS variance, indicating instability. * The run with `osu!stable-bpfland-preempt-off` presents a 19% lower average FPS compared to `osu!stable-lavd`, along with a 88% higher FPS variance, again pointing to performance instability. # Summary In this benchmark comparing the performance of `lavd`, `bpfland`, and `bpfland` with preemptive off, it is evident that the `lavd` scheduler outperforms the other options significantly. Not only does it provide the highest FPS, but it also maintains the most consistent performance levels, making it the best overall choice. The runs with `bpfland` and `bpfland` with preemptive off both demonstrate lower and more erratic FPS, indicating that they are less suitable for smooth and high-performance gaming experiences in this context.