Benchmark #1335

Download
World of Warcraft bfdland vs bore timetest

Tested using /timetest 1 on uber settings (hyperframe addon)

Submitted 1 day ago by hallwayraptor

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
World of Warcraft CachyOS bfdland timetest Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (RADV NAVI22) AMD Ryzen 5 5600 6-Core Processor 34 GB 6.14.3-2-cachyos performance
World of Warcraft CachyOS BORE timetest Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (RADV NAVI22) AMD Ryzen 5 5600 6-Core Processor 34 GB 6.14.3-2-cachyos performance
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `World of Warcraft CachyOS bfdland timetest` with significantly higher average FPS compared to the other run. * **Smoothest FPS**: `World of Warcraft CachyOS bfdland timetest` due to having a substantially lower standard deviation in FPS, indicating more consistent frame delivery. * **Best overall**: `World of Warcraft CachyOS bfdland timetest` due to both its higher FPS and more stable performance. # Issues: * The comparison between `bpfland` and `bore` schedulers showed a significant disparity in FPS, with the `bore` scheduler delivering considerably lower average FPS than its counterpart, coupled with higher frame time variance. # Summary The benchmark comparison between the `bpfland` and `bore` schedulers on `CachyOS` reveals that the `bpfland` scheduler significantly outperforms in terms of both frame rate and smoothness. This difference in performance is reflected in the substantially higher average FPS and lower FPS variance for the `bpfland` scheduler. This suggests that the `bpfland` configuration is more efficient in this context, offering a superior gaming experience in World of Warcraft, particularly on high settings with additional demands from the hyperframe addon.