# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `bpfland` with approximately 0.7% higher average FPS compared to `bore`. * **Smoothest FPS**: `bore` due to having roughly 9% lower standard deviation and variance in FPS, providing a steadier experience. * **Best overall**: `bore` due to its combination of smoothness and overall performance, with a higher consistency in frame times despite slightly lower FPS. # Summary In the comparison between the `sched_ext` method `bpfland` and an unspecified approach within the same kernel configuration and system, `bpfland` offered a marginally higher average FPS. However, `bore` excelled in consistency and smoothness, providing a better overall experience due to lower variance in FPS and frame times, highlighting the importance of stability over sheer performance under certain conditions. Both methods used the same hardware and software setups, ensuring that the observed performance differences were solely due to the respective approaches in question. This suggests that while `bpfland` may be beneficial for maximized FPS under specific scenarios, `bore` provides a more balanced and steady performance suitable for environments where frame pacing is critical.