### Top runs - **Highest FPS**: `BPFLAND-k-t0` with an average FPS slightly higher than the rest. - **Smoothest FPS**: `BPFLAND-k-t0` with the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS. - **Best overall**: `BPFLAND-k-t0` balances the highest average FPS with the lowest variability, making it the best choice overall. ### Issues - **ASDF** exhibits a lower minimum FPS compared to the other runs, which could be a sign of stability problems during this test. The average FPS is also marginally lower, but consistent, suggesting a potential hardware or software bottleneck during this run. ### Summary The benchmark tests display similar hardware and software environments, ensuring a consistent basis for comparison. Among the runs, `BPFLAND-k-t0` stands out as the best performer, both in terms of the highest average FPS and the smoothest FPS, indicating excellent overall stability and performance. `ASDF` shows a noticeably lower minimum FPS, while the average FPS is marginally lower compared to the others, suggesting potential issues with performance stability. The other runs (`BPFLAND-k-c0` and `ASDF`) performed comparably in terms of overall frame rates but were outperformed by `BPFLAND-k-t0` in stability. The causes for the discrepancies in `ASDF` could stem from transient system factors or less optimized conditions during the test run.