# Top runs - **Highest FPS**: `BPFLAND-k-c0` has the highest mean FPS. - **Smoothest FPS**: `BPFLAND-c0` exhibits the lowest variance and standard deviation in FPS. - **Best overall**: `BPFLAND-c0` due to its balance of highest mean FPS and lowest variance. # Issues - **Label: LAVD** demonstrates a significantly higher variance in FPS (considerable percentage increase compared to others), indicating instability. Despite using the same hardware and software environment as other runs, its frame times and FPS variance are noticeably higher. # Summary All benchmark runs were conducted under the same hardware and software conditions, providing a consistent basis for comparison. `BPFLAND-k-c0` achieved the highest FPS, but `BPFLAND-c0` demonstrated the smoothest performance with the lowest FPS variance, striking the best overall balance. Conversely, the `LAVD` run showed significant instability with a far higher variance in FPS than other runs, indicating potential issues with consistency. The remaining runs showed minor differences in terms of mean FPS and variance, making them relatively similar in performance.