Benchmark #1526

Download
Wuthering Waves NTSYNC vs FSYNC

30 Second run loop in Ragunna City Using AlteriaX / WuWa-Configs on Github Config 2/ RT Low 1440p DLSS Balanced Max settings except RT Low and Medium Shadows

Submitted 4 days ago by dangerouslybased

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
spritz-wine-tkg-10.9 CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D 8-Core Processor 17 GB 6.15.3-3-cachyos powersave
spritz-wine-tkg-ntsync-10.9 CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D 8-Core Processor 17 GB 6.15.3-3-cachyos powersave
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `spritz-wine-tkg-ntsync-10.9` with approximately 15% higher average FPS compared to the other run. * **Smoothest FPS**: `spritz-wine-tkg-ntsync-10.9` with around 70% lower standard deviation and variance in frame time, indicating much more consistency. * **Best overall**: `spritz-wine-tkg-ntsync-10.9` as it offers higher FPS and smoother performance. # Summary The benchmark compares `NTSYNC` and `FSYNC` on Wuthering Waves in a high-demand graphical setting. Both runs were executed on identical hardware configurations using the same `CachyOS` operating system and the `powersave` Linux scheduler. The `NTSYNC` implementation not only delivers roughly 15% higher FPS but also shows remarkable improvements in stability with frame time variability decreased by approximately 70%. This indicates that `NTSYNC` might offer a better synchronized system response under these specific gaming and system configurations, making it a more efficient choice over `FSYNC` under the tested conditions.