Benchmark #153

Download
MWO scheduler test

Didn't switch to max settings, but most are high. MWO is incredibly CPU reliant either way. 100s run through Solaris City. 100 log interval. taskset=taskset -c 0-5,12-17 for the first CCD.

Submitted 3 months ago by thisusernamechangethingisdumb

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
noset bore CachyOS AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (RADV NAVI22) AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core Processor 34 GB 6.10.2-2-cachyos-lto performance
noset bpfland CachyOS AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (RADV NAVI22) AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core Processor 34 GB 6.10.2-2-cachyos-lto performance
noset lavd CachyOS AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (RADV NAVI22) AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core Processor 34 GB 6.10.2-2-cachyos-lto performance
noset rusty CachyOS AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (RADV NAVI22) AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core Processor 34 GB 6.10.2-2-cachyos-lto performance
taskset bore CachyOS AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (RADV NAVI22) AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core Processor 34 GB 6.10.2-2-cachyos-lto performance
taskset bpfland CachyOS AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (RADV NAVI22) AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core Processor 34 GB 6.10.2-2-cachyos-lto performance
taskset lavd CachyOS AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (RADV NAVI22) AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core Processor 34 GB 6.10.2-2-cachyos-lto performance
taskset rusty CachyOS AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (RADV NAVI22) AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core Processor 34 GB 6.10.2-2-cachyos-lto performance
### Top runs - **Highest FPS**: `taskset bore` - This run achieved the highest average FPS, making it the top performer in terms of raw frame rates. - **Smoothest FPS**: `taskset lavd` - This run exhibited the lowest FPS variance and standard deviation, ensuring the most consistent and smooth gaming experience. - **Best overall**: `taskset bore` - With the highest FPS and acceptable stability (variance within reasonable limits), this run is the best overall performer. ### Summary All 8 runs used the same hardware and software configurations, ensuring a fair comparison. The best-performing run in terms of FPS is `taskset bore`, while `taskset lavd` offered the smoothest frame rates. The runs `noset bpfland` and `taskset bpfland` showed significantly lower FPS and higher FPS variance, indicating possible inefficiencies in their configurations. The variance and standard deviations were carefully analyzed, and although `taskset bore` had a slightly higher variance than some other runs, its high FPS justifies its selection as the best overall performer. The smooth, consistent performance of `taskset lavd` makes it ideal for minimizing perceptible frame drops. Other runs like `noset bore`, `noset lavd`, and `taskset rusty` were similar in FPS but lagged behind marginally in terms of stability.