# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `bore` - This run achieved the highest average FPS. * **Smoothest FPS**: `bore` - This run recorded the lowest FPS standard deviation and variance, indicating the smoothest performance. * **Best overall**: `bore` - Due to its high FPS and smooth performance, this run stands out as the best overall. # Issues: * The run with `rustland` scheduler exhibited noticeably lower FPS and higher frame time variance compared to others. The average FPS was significantly lower, and it introduced more fluctuations in frame times. * The `cpu load` and `gpu load` for the run with `lavd` scheduler were considerably lower compared to other runs, suggesting a performance bottleneck or underutilization of resources. # Summary The benchmark compared different Rust schedulers on an identical setup (CachyOS, `NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060`, `Intel Core i5-10600K CPU @ 4.10GHz`, and `performance` Linux scheduler). The `bore` scheduler emerged as the top performer in terms of both FPS and frame time consistency. The `rustland` scheduler failed to deliver competitive FPS and suffered from significant frame time fluctuations. The `lavd` scheduler exhibited lower resource utilization, potentially limiting its performance. Overall, the `bore` scheduler proved to be the most efficient and stable under the tested conditions.