Submitted 11 months ago by cuysaurus
Label | OS | GPU | CPU | RAM | OS specific |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
bore | CachyOS | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | Intel Core i5-10600K CPU @ 4.10GHz | 17 GB | 6.10.2-2-cachyos performance |
bpfland | CachyOS | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | Intel Core i5-10600K CPU @ 4.10GHz | 17 GB | 6.10.2-2-cachyos performance |
lavd | CachyOS | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | Intel Core i5-10600K CPU @ 4.10GHz | 17 GB | 6.10.2-2-cachyos performance |
rustland | CachyOS | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | Intel Core i5-10600K CPU @ 4.10GHz | 17 GB | 6.10.2-2-cachyos performance |
bore
- This run achieved the highest average FPS.bore
- This run recorded the lowest FPS standard deviation and variance, indicating the smoothest performance.bore
- Due to its high FPS and smooth performance, this run stands out as the best overall.rustland
scheduler exhibited noticeably lower FPS and higher frame time variance compared to others. The average FPS was significantly lower, and it introduced more fluctuations in frame times.cpu load
and gpu load
for the run with lavd
scheduler were considerably lower compared to other runs, suggesting a performance bottleneck or underutilization of resources.The benchmark compared different Rust schedulers on an identical setup (CachyOS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
, Intel Core i5-10600K CPU @ 4.10GHz
, and performance
Linux scheduler). The bore
scheduler emerged as the top performer in terms of both FPS and frame time consistency. The rustland
scheduler failed to deliver competitive FPS and suffered from significant frame time fluctuations. The lavd
scheduler exhibited lower resource utilization, potentially limiting its performance. Overall, the bore
scheduler proved to be the most efficient and stable under the tested conditions.