Benchmark #1591

Download
Tiny Tina Wonderlands: Fsync vs NTSync

Quick test of Tiny Tina's benchmark tool with Fsync vs NTsync

Submitted 2 weeks ago by meunomenaointeressa

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
Wonderlands_2025-07-12_11-21-20 Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (RADV NAVI22) AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.15.5-200.nobara.fc42.x86_64 powersave
Wonderlands_2025-07-12_11-25-48 Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (RADV NAVI22) AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.15.5-200.nobara.fc42.x86_64 powersave
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Wonderlands_2025-07-12_11-21-20` with a marginally higher average FPS compared to the other run. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Wonderlands_2025-07-12_11-25-48` showing significantly lower FPS variability, resulting in a smoother performance. * **Best overall**: `Wonderlands_2025-07-12_11-25-48` due to its smoother FPS and minimal trade-off in average FPS. # Summary The benchmark compares performance differences between the `Fsync` and `NTsync` synchronization methods in Tiny Tina's Wonderlands. Both runs use identical hardware and software configurations, utilizing an AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT GPU and AMD Ryzen 7 5700X CPU on the Steam Runtime 3 and a Linux 6.15.5 kernel with the `powersave` scheduler. The first configuration using `Fsync` achieves a slightly higher average FPS, whereas the second setup with `NTsync` offers smoother gameplay, indicated by lower variance in FPS and frame time. This finding suggests that while `NTsync` may offer a more stable gaming experience, the performance trade-offs are minimal.