### Top runs - **Highest FPS**: `bpfland-k` - **Smoothest FPS**: `asdf-1ms` - **Best overall**: `bpfland-k` ### Issues - `bpfland-default` run shows slightly lower stability with higher variance and standard deviation compared to other runs. ### Summary The benchmark consists of four runs with identical hardware and software configurations. The runs labeled `asdf-1ms` and `asdf-default` are notably similar in performance, both offering good FPS and stability. The `bpfland-k` run has the highest average FPS among all the runs and comes with decent stability, making it the best overall. However, the `bpfland-default` run, although similar in FPS average to other runs, shows less stability with a higher variance and standard deviation in FPS, indicating more fluctuations in frame rates, which might affect the smoothness of gameplay. Overall, there is a slight difference in stability across runs but no major issues impacting the frame rates significantly.