# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `X11-Chivalry2-Win64-Shipping_2025-07-19_10-13-34` as it has a higher average FPS, approximately 3% more than the Wayland run. * **Smoothest FPS**: `WAYLAND-Chivalry2-Win64-Shipping_2025-07-19_10-07-07` since it has a lower standard deviation and variance, making the FPS more consistent compared to XWayland. * **Best overall**: `WAYLAND-Chivalry2-Win64-Shipping_2025-07-19_10-07-07` because it offers a smoother performance, despite having slightly lower average FPS, the increased stability and consistency make it preferable overall. # Summary This benchmark compares the performance of "Chivalry 2" on Arch Linux using `Wayland` versus `XWayland`. While the `XWayland` configuration provides higher average FPS, the `Wayland` setup delivers notably smoother gameplay with significantly more consistent frame times and lower FPS variance. Both configurations utilize the same hardware and Linux scheduler, ensuring a fair comparison focused on the graphical server environment. The context highlights how `Wayland` can offer a more stable gaming experience, despite not achieving the peak FPS delivered by `XWayland`.