Benchmark #1646

Download
Satisfactory NTSync vs Fsync

Testing Satisfactory NTSync vs Fsync on GE-Proton 10-10

Submitted 6 days ago by rebl11

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
Satisfactory NTSync Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT (RADV NAVI32) AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core Processor 67 GB 6.15.6-201.nobara.fc42.x86_64 performance
Satisfactory Fsync Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT (RADV NAVI32) AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core Processor 67 GB 6.15.6-201.nobara.fc42.x86_64 performance
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Satisfactory NTSync` with an average FPS slightly higher than `Satisfactory Fsync`. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Satisfactory Fsync` with lower standard deviation and variance than `Satisfactory NTSync`, indicating more consistent frame rates. * **Best overall**: `Satisfactory Fsync` due to its smoother FPS performance while maintaining a very close average FPS to `Satisfactory NTSync`. # Summary The benchmark comparison of `Satisfactory` running with `NTSync` versus `Fsync` mode on GE-Proton 10-10 indicates that although `NTSync` delivers a marginally higher average FPS, `Fsync` provides smoother gameplay, as evidenced by its lower frame time variance and standard deviation. Both tests were conducted under identical system conditions with the same OS, hardware, and Linux scheduler configurations, allowing for a direct comparison of the synchronization modes' impact on performance within the game.