# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BeamNG.drive Fsync` and it has approximately 5% higher average FPS compared to the other configuration used. * **Smoothest FPS**: `BeamNG.drive Fsync` has the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS, indicating a smoother performance curve. * **Best overall**: `BeamNG.drive Fsync` due to its higher FPS and smooth performance despite facing similar conditions. # Issues: * The `Fs` configuration shows higher frame time variance by approximately 50% compared to the alternative. This could cause noticeable performance concerns. * While both configurations utilize the same hardware and environmental settings, the `Fs` configuration significantly uses more RAM, approximately 13% additional usage compared to the alternative, which may impact performance on systems with less available memory. # Summary In this benchmark, the performance between `NTsync` and `Fsync` modes in the BeamNG.drive game has been evaluated using consistent hardware and software configurations. The `Fs` mode demonstrated superior performance in terms of both average FPS and FPS smoothness, which reflects in its overall best rating. However, it also exhibits significantly higher frame time variability and RAM usage, suggesting `NT` mode might still be preferable for systems where memory availability and consistency are critical.