Benchmark #1649

Download
ETS2 NTsync vs Fsync

Submitted 6 days ago by rebl11

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
eurotrucks2 Fsync Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT (RADV NAVI32) AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core Processor 67 GB 6.15.6-201.nobara.fc42.x86_64 performance
eurotrucks2 NTsync Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT (RADV NAVI32) AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core Processor 67 GB 6.15.6-201.nobara.fc42.x86_64 performance
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `eurotrucks2 NTsync` provides approximately 9% higher average FPS compared to the other run. * **Smoothest FPS**: `eurotrucks2 Fsync` has a more stable FPS with around 10% lower standard deviation and variance. * **Best overall**: `eurotrucks2 NTsync` offers the best overall performance, with its significantly higher FPS compensating for the slightly increased variability. # Summary The benchmark results comparing `NTsync` and `Fsync` implementations in `ETS2` are insightful. The `NTsync` configuration excels in terms of average FPS, showing approximately 9% improvement over `Fsync`, making it advantageous for delivering higher frame rates. However, `Fsync` demonstrates more consistent frame rendering, reflected in 10% lower variability in FPS. Both configurations operate on the same hardware and Linux scheduler environments, ensuring a valid comparison focused on the effects of the synchronization method in use. The selection of `NTsync` as the best overall performer is largely due to its superior FPS, despite the marginal compromise in stability.