## Top runs - **Highest FPS**: `BPFLAND-5ms` had the highest average FPS, outperforming `BPFLAND-20ms` by approximately 3%. - **Smoothest FPS**: `BPFLAND-20ms` had the smoothest FPS with a standard deviation 10% lower compared to `BPFLAND-5ms`. - **Best overall**: `BPFLAND-5ms` is the best overall as it has a higher FPS and only a marginal increase in variance compared to `BPFLAND-20ms`. ## Summary Both runs have similar hardware and software configurations, with no discrepancies in the environment except for a slight difference in CPU temperature. `BPFLAND-5ms` run shows better performance with 3% higher FPS on average compared to `BPFLAND-20ms`, making it the top performer. However, `BPFLAND-20ms` had smoother frame rates with a 10% lower standard deviation, suggesting it has less variability. No significant issues were found affecting FPS, making both runs reliable with their respective strengths.