### Top runs - **Highest FPS:** `BPFLAND` - **Smoothest FPS:** `BORE` - **Best overall:** `BPFLAND` ### Issues - **Run `LAVD` has significantly lower FPS compared to other runs, with a reduction of over 10% in FPS mean compared to `BPFLAND` and `BORE`.** ### Summary The benchmark data provided compares three different runs: `BORE`, `BPFLAND`, and `LAVD`, all using identical hardware and software profiles. `BPFLAND` emerges as the best performer overall with the highest average FPS, while `BORE` demonstrates the smoothest performance with the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS. However, the `LAVD` run underperforms significantly in terms of FPS mean, despite having slightly different frame times and GPU loads, suggesting possible instability or suboptimal configuration during that particular run. Other metrics such as CPU load, RAM usage, and temperatures appear consistent across all runs, indicating that the main issue lies with the FPS performance in `LAVD`.