Benchmark #175

Download
CP2077 BORE vs. BPFLAND vs. LAVD vs. RUSTY

Low preset, FSR Ultra Performance.

Submitted 1 month ago by lionheartp

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
BORE Nobara Linux 40 (GNOME Edition) AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (RADV NAVI21) AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.10.2-202.fsync.fc40.x86_64 performance
BPFLAND Nobara Linux 40 (GNOME Edition) AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (RADV NAVI21) AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.10.2-202.fsync.fc40.x86_64 performance
LAVD Nobara Linux 40 (GNOME Edition) AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (RADV NAVI21) AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.10.2-202.fsync.fc40.x86_64 performance
RUSTY Nobara Linux 40 (GNOME Edition) AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (RADV NAVI21) AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.10.2-202.fsync.fc40.x86_64 performance
## Top runs - **Highest FPS:** `RUSTY` achieved the highest average FPS with ~15% more FPS than the next highest run. - **Smoothest FPS:** `BPFLAND` had the lowest variance in FPS, showing ~35% less deviation compared to others. - **Best overall:** `RUSTY` combined high average FPS with reasonably low variance, providing an ~8% better overall experience over the next best run. ## Issues - `BPFLAND` had ~13% lower average FPS compared to other runs. ## Summary All runs were conducted under identical hardware and software environments, ensuring fair comparisons. `RUSTY` stands out with the highest average FPS and a good balance of stability, making it the best overall run. `BPFLAND` showed the smoothest FPS but its average FPS was significantly lower, making it unsuitable for consideration in the top runs. `BORE` and `LAVD` were relatively similar but fell just short of `RUSTY` in their balance of FPS and stability. This benchmark highlights the exceptional performance and stability in the `RUSTY` run whereas other runs had either lower FPS or stability issues.