Benchmark #175

Download
CP2077 BORE vs. BPFLAND vs. LAVD vs. RUSTY

Low preset, FSR Ultra Performance.

Submitted 10 months ago by lionheartp

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
BORE Nobara Linux 40 (GNOME Edition) AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (RADV NAVI21) AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.10.2-202.fsync.fc40.x86_64 performance
BPFLAND Nobara Linux 40 (GNOME Edition) AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (RADV NAVI21) AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.10.2-202.fsync.fc40.x86_64 performance
LAVD Nobara Linux 40 (GNOME Edition) AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (RADV NAVI21) AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.10.2-202.fsync.fc40.x86_64 performance
RUSTY Nobara Linux 40 (GNOME Edition) AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (RADV NAVI21) AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.10.2-202.fsync.fc40.x86_64 performance
## Top runs - **Highest FPS:** `RUSTY` achieved the highest average FPS with ~15% more FPS than the next highest run. - **Smoothest FPS:** `BPFLAND` had the lowest variance in FPS, showing ~35% less deviation compared to others. - **Best overall:** `RUSTY` combined high average FPS with reasonably low variance, providing an ~8% better overall experience over the next best run. ## Issues - `BPFLAND` had ~13% lower average FPS compared to other runs. ## Summary All runs were conducted under identical hardware and software environments, ensuring fair comparisons. `RUSTY` stands out with the highest average FPS and a good balance of stability, making it the best overall run. `BPFLAND` showed the smoothest FPS but its average FPS was significantly lower, making it unsuitable for consideration in the top runs. `BORE` and `LAVD` were relatively similar but fell just short of `RUSTY` in their balance of FPS and stability. This benchmark highlights the exceptional performance and stability in the `RUSTY` run whereas other runs had either lower FPS or stability issues.