Benchmark #1752

Download
No Man's Sky: Fsync vs NTsync

Submitted 4 days ago by chrislane

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
Fsync Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (RADV NAVI21) AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core Processor 34 GB 6.16.4-1-cachyos powersave
NTsync Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (RADV NAVI21) AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core Processor 34 GB 6.16.4-1-cachyos powersave
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Fsync`. It achieved a higher average FPS compared to the other run. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Fsync`. It exhibited the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS, indicating more consistent performance. * **Best overall**: `Fsync`. With higher average FPS and smoother performance metrics, it offers the best balance between speed and stability. # Issues: * The `NTsync` configuration experienced issues with lower overall FPS and higher standard deviation compared to its counterpart, indicating less stability and efficiency. # Summary This benchmark compares the performance of `Fsync` against `NTsync` in "No Man's Sky" using identical hardware and settings. `Fsync` outperformed `NTsync` significantly in terms of both average and stability of the FPS. The Linux kernel version and scheduler were consistent across both runs, which isolates the difference primarily to the synchronization methods used. `Fsync` demonstrates a more stable and higher performance profile within this particular test, making it the preferable choice for this gaming scenario.