Benchmark #1787

Download
Megabonk Windows VS Linux

OGL XWayland on Linux. max settings with motion blur & AA off on both. I realised I left steam background record on both windows & linux so i did another run with it off. monke on sand level just walking in circles to test.

Submitted 6 days ago by yobson

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
Megabonk Windows Recording ON Windows AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT
Megabonk Windows Recording OFF Windows AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT
Megabonk Linux Recording OFF Steam Runtime 2 (soldier) AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core Processor 34 GB 6.16.7-2-cachyos performance
Megabonk Linux Recording ON Steam Runtime 2 (soldier) AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core Processor 34 GB 6.16.7-2-cachyos performance
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Megabonk Linux Recording ON` with a significantly higher average FPS compared to all other runs. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Megabonk Linux Recording ON` due to its lower standard deviation and variance in frame time compared to the other runs. * **Best overall**: `Megabonk Linux Recording ON`, as it offers both high FPS and relative smoothness, making it the best choice for performance and stability. # Issues: * Both Windows runs have significantly lower average FPS and higher frame time variance compared to the Linux runs. This suggests that the performance on Linux is much superior to Windows in this benchmark. # Summary This benchmark compares the performance of the game "Megabonk" on Windows and Linux operating systems, both with and without background recording enabled. The Linux runs, particularly with recording on, demonstrate remarkable performance, showcasing significantly higher FPS and smoother frame times. This implies that Linux, with the `performance` scheduler and `Steam Runtime 2`, is more efficient in handling the workload compared to Windows in this particular setup.