Benchmark #1798

Download
WoW - Bore Vs SCX ?

Quick comparison of World of Warcraft in town, default Bore vs a scheduler I've been messing around with.

Submitted 1 month ago by ritzdacat

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
WoW_SCX?2 CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D 8-Core Processor 101 GB 6.17.0-3-cachyos performance
WoW_SCX?1 CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D 8-Core Processor 101 GB 6.17.0-3-cachyos performance
WoW_Bore2 CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D 8-Core Processor 101 GB 6.17.0-3-cachyos performance
WoW_Bore1 CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D 8-Core Processor 101 GB 6.17.0-3-cachyos performance
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `WoW_SCX?1` with significantly higher average FPS compared to the other runs. * **Smoothest FPS**: `WoW_SCX?1` due to the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS. * **Best overall**: `WoW_SCX?1` because it combines the highest average FPS with the smoothest performance. # Issues: * The performance under the `Bore` scheduler has significantly lower FPS and higher variability in frame times compared to the custom scheduler, indicating a performance disadvantage. * One of the `Bore` scheduler runs (`WoW_Bore1`) shows a considerable issue with GPU load and lower core clock speeds, diverging from the stable GPU statistics seen in other runs. # Summary The benchmark compares performance between the default `Bore` scheduler and a custom scheduler for World of Warcraft running on `CachyOS` with a consistent hardware setup. The custom scheduler demonstrates a substantial improvement in terms of higher average FPS and smoother frame delivery compared to the traditional `Bore` scheduler. The custom scheduler run excels by providing not only the best performance but also a better gaming experience with less variability in gaming frame rates. In contrast, `Bore` scheduler runs exhibit significant performance issues with higher FPS variability, especially in GPU resource management.