Benchmark #184

Download
osu!stable + ffmpeg - BORE vs lavd vs bpfland vs lavd w/ --no-freq-scaling - iGPU Version

scx-scheds-git 1.0.1.r103.g38efa97-1

Submitted 3 months ago by .dnaim

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
osu!lavd CachyOS AMD Radeon Graphics AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Creator Edition 14 GB 6.10.3-2-cachyos-lto powersave
osu!BORE CachyOS AMD Radeon Graphics AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Creator Edition 14 GB 6.10.3-2-cachyos-lto powersave
osu!bpfland CachyOS AMD Radeon Graphics AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Creator Edition 14 GB 6.10.3-2-cachyos-lto powersave
osu!lavd-no-freq-scaling CachyOS AMD Radeon Graphics AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Creator Edition 14 GB 6.10.3-2-cachyos-lto powersave
## Top runs - **Highest FPS**: `osu!BORE` has the highest average FPS with approximately 5% higher than the second best. - **Smoothest FPS**: `osu!lavd-no-freq-scaling` has the smoothest FPS with the lowest standard deviation and variance of FPS values. - **Best overall**: `osu!BORE` is the best overall run, combining high FPS with relatively stable performance. ## Issues - **osu!bpfland**: This run has significantly lower FPS than other runs, approximately 20% worse on average. Even though the hardware/software used is the same, the FPS is notably lower which points to an issue specifically with this configuration. ## Summary The benchmark data for `osu!stable + ffmpeg - BORE vs lavd vs bpfland vs lavd w/ --no-freq-scaling - iGPU Version` across four runs reveal some distinct differences. `osu!BORE` stands out as the best performer in terms of FPS, although its stability is slightly compromised compared to `osu!lavd-no-freq-scaling`, which offers the most consistent frame rates. Conversely, `osu!bpfland` shows a significant drop in performance, around 20% less FPS compared to the others, despite using identical hardware and software configurations. The differences in performance and stability highlight possible configuration-specific issues that warrant further investigation, especially in the case of `osu!bpfland`. Overall, `osu!lavd` and `osu!lavd-no-freq-scaling` also deliver commendable performance but do not outshine the top choices in either FPS or stability.