# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `scx_bpfland -m performance` offers the highest average FPS, delivering approximately 5% more FPS compared to the other runs. * **Smoothest FPS**: `scx_cosmos -c 0 -p 0` provides the lowest variability in FPS, with about 18% lower standard deviation and variance compared to the next best, indicating a more stable performance. * **Best overall**: `scx_bpfland -m performance` achieves the balance with the highest average FPS and a competitive stability, offering an optimal combination for both performance and consistency. # Issues: * The `EEVDF` configuration demonstrates a considerably higher CPU load, with a 15-20% increase compared to others, alongside a marginally elevated average GPU temperature. This can affect thermal performance and long-term stability. # Summary In this benchmark, where `EEVDF`, `scx_bpfland`, `scx_cosmos`, and `scx_lavd` schedulers are compared, `scx_bpfland` emerges as the top performer with the highest FPS and good stability. Meanwhile, `scx_cosmos` offers the most consistent experience with the lowest FPS variance, albeit with slightly lower average FPS. However, the `EEVDF` configuration struggles with increased CPU load, suggesting inefficiencies in handling computational demands compared to others. This analysis highlights the nuanced performance advantages and trade-offs of different scheduler strategies in a typical gaming scenario on Linux systems.