# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `EEVDF` with an average FPS approximately 5% higher than the scx schedulers. * **Smoothest FPS**: `scx_tickless -f 5000 -s 5000` with the lowest FPS variance and standard deviation, hence offering the most consistent performance. * **Best overall**: `scx_flash -m all` as it provides a good balance of high average FPS along with relatively low variance, resulting in both high and stable performance. # Issues: * The `EEVDF` run exhibited a significantly higher variance in FPS, approximately 90% more than the scx schedulers, indicating inconsistency in performance. * The `scx_p2dq --task-slice true -f --sched-mode performance` has a notably higher variance compared to other runs, reflecting higher instability in frame rendering. # Summary In this benchmark, the performance comparison between `EEVDF` and various `scx` schedulers was carried out under consistent hardware and software conditions. Both solutions operated under similar high-performance scenarios involving the same processor, GPU, and system configuration. However, `EEVDF` managed to achieve the highest average FPS, indicating superior peak performance, though with inconsistency as indicated by its higher variance. On the other hand, the `scx` schedulers exhibited more stable results, with some configurations providing a well-balanced performance in terms of average FPS and stability. This suggests that while `EEVDF` may deliver higher performance, its practical application might be limited by its inconsistency in frame delivery compared to the steadier `scx` scheduler options.