# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `scx_bpfland -m performance`, providing a performance edge with a notable increase in average frames per second over other schedulers. * **Smoothest FPS**: `scx_lavd --performance`, achieving the lowest standard deviation in frame rendering, which indicates high stability. * **Best overall**: `scx_lavd --performance`, offering a combination of competitive FPS and stability, making it a balanced choice for consistent performance. # Issues: * The configuration using `scx_bpfland -m performance` exhibited a significantly higher variance and standard deviation in FPS compared to other runs, indicating a less stable frame rate despite its higher average FPS. This can affect the perceived smoothness of gameplay. * The EEVDF configuration demonstrated a higher CPU load, which could indicate potential inefficiencies that might affect performance sustainability during extended sessions. * The configuration using `scx_tickless -f 5000 -s 5000` showed a higher standard deviation in FPS than typical for this set of benchmarks, leading to potential inconsistencies in frame smoothness. # Summary The comparison between different `sched_ext` schedulers and the EEVDF scheduler in this benchmark offers insights into the performance dynamics using 1440p Ultra High graphics settings. The EEVDF scheduler indicates a slightly higher CPU load, which might impact resource allocation efficiency. While `scx_bpfland -m performance` presents the highest average FPS, it comes with considerable variance and reduced frame stability. Conversely, `scx_lavd --performance` strikes a balance with relatively smooth and stable output. This analysis suggests that while higher FPS is attainable, trade-offs with stability and load efficiency must be carefully considered based on specific use-case scenarios.