Benchmark #1870

Download
Zenless Zone Zero

+150Mhz OC

Submitted 20 hours ago by midi4911

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
ZenlessZoneZero_2025-10-25_01-43-24 CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Intel Xeon CPU E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz 50 GB 6.17.4-1-cachyos-bore-lto schedutil
ZenlessZoneZero_2025-10-25_01-40-23 CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Intel Xeon CPU E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz 50 GB 6.17.4-1-cachyos-bore-lto schedutil
ZZZ_NR_HW_ALL_HWP_NATIVE copy CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Intel Xeon CPU E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz 50 GB 6.17.4-1-cachyos-bmq-lto schedutil
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `ZZZ_NR_HW_ALL_HWP_NATIVE copy` with around 57% higher performance in terms of average FPS compared to others, indicating its superiority in raw performance. * **Smoothest FPS**: `ZZZ_NR_HW_ALL_HWP_NATIVE copy` with approximately 9% lower variance and standard deviation in FPS, showcasing its stability. * **Best overall**: `ZZZ_NR_HW_ALL_HWP_NATIVE copy` as it combines both the highest average FPS and the lowest FPS variance, making it the most balanced option. # Issues: * One of the runs uses the `cachyos-bmq-lto` kernel while others use the `cachyos-bore-lto`, which might affect the performance metrics differently. * Variances in GPU load and temperature readings suggest possible inconsistency or configuration differences in one scenario, potentially affecting thermal performance. # Summary This benchmark highlights the performance impact of different Linux kernel configurations on the same hardware setup when running `Zenless Zone Zero`. By examining the three configurations, it becomes clear that utilizing the `cachyos-bmq-lto` kernel with the `schedutil` scheduler results in the best balance of high performance and stability. The third configuration achieves a significantly higher FPS and smoother operation compared to the others. Also noted is a discrepancy in performance and thermal conditions, possibly due to the different Linux kernels applied in the setups.