Benchmark #1877

Download
Overwatch 2 - EEVDF vs bpfland Auto vs bpfland Gaming

using latest git bpfland at the time of writing this. Benchmark loggin was set to 300 seconds/5 minutes to be more precise

Submitted 6 days ago by gardendata61371

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
EEVDF Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.17.5-2-cachyos performance
scx_bpfland Auto Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.17.5-2-cachyos performance
scx_bpfland Gaming Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.17.5-2-cachyos performance
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `scx_bpfland Gaming` with the highest average FPS, providing a notable performance boost in frames per second. * **Smoothest FPS**: `scx_bpfland Gaming` with the lowest standard deviation and variance, indicating the most consistent frame rate among the runs. * **Best overall**: `scx_bpfland Gaming` strikes a balance with the highest FPS and smoothest frame time consistency, offering optimal performance in this context. # Issues: * The run using `EEVDF` had approximately 3% lower average FPS compared to other configurations, indicating potential performance issues with FPS. Despite the same hardware, it shows the highest variability in frame time, suggesting less consistency. # Summary This benchmark compared different scheduling configurations for running Overwatch 2 on a Linux system with identical hardware specifications. The `scx_bpfland Gaming` scheduler demonstrated superior performance with the highest average FPS and the most consistent smoothness, outperforming both the `EEVDF` and `scx_bpfland Auto` configurations. While `EEVDF` showed a noticeable drop in FPS and increased frame time variability, `scx_bpfland Auto` offered a marginal improvement over `EEVDF`, but still fell behind in frame rate stability compared to the gaming-optimized configuration.