# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `scx_bpfland_1.0.18_ArcRivals3` features the highest average FPS, which indicates excellent performance in this particular test. * **Smoothest FPS**: `scx_bpfland_1.0.18_ArcRivals2` offers the smoothest FPS with the lowest standard deviation and variance, leading to a consistently stable gaming experience. * **Best overall**: `scx_bpfland_1.0.18_ArcRivals2` stands out as the best overall option given its balance of high average FPS and exceptionally low FPS variability. # Issues: * The runs with `scx_cosmos` show consistent performance, but their average FPS is slightly lower than the runs with other schedulers. * The `scx_beerland` runs are notably lower in FPS and exhibit a patch requirement issue with kernel 6.17 which may have impacted performance adversely. Notably, the variance in the clock speeds for GPU in these runs could have contributed. * The marginally fluctuating performance of the `scx_beerland` tests indicates a potential issue with missing patches or kernel-specific optimizations that are not applied in comparison to the other schedulers. # Summary This benchmark analysis primarily focuses on comparing various `scx` schedulers under the same hardware and software conditions, except for the `scx_beerland` runs that appear affected by a missing patch in kernel 6.17. Through this dataset, `scx_bpfland_1.0.18` proves to be the top-performing scheduler with its superior average FPS and steady frame delivery, making it ideal for scenarios where both performance and consistency are priorities. The `scx_cosmos` schedulers, while decent, do not match this peak performance, and `scx_beerland` is notably underperforming, prompting a need for updates or bug fixes for full effectiveness. Overall, this benchmark demonstrates the exploration of performance variations under different scheduling methodologies.