# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `bpfland-main` with approximately x% higher mean FPS compared to the others. * **Smoothest FPS**: `lavd-amp-v4` with approximately y% lower standard deviation compared to the others. * **Best overall**: `bpfland-main` due to having the highest mean FPS with a moderate standard deviation. # Issues: * The configuration using the `lavd-amp-v4` scheduler has a significantly higher variance in FPS, approximately z% higher than the others, suggesting more inconsistent performance. # Summary The benchmark data compares three different scheduler implementations (`bore-5.2.8`, `bpfland-main`, and `lavd-amp-v4`) on the same hardware setup running the Black Myth: Wukong Benchmark Tool under CachyOS. The `bpfland-main` scheduler provides the highest average FPS, making it the top performer in terms of raw output. On the other hand, the `lavd-amp-v4` scheduler, while showing the smoothest performance in terms of FPS consistency, exhibits significantly higher variance in FPS, indicating inconsistent performance relative to the others. Overall, this benchmark highlights that while `bpfland-main` offers the best balance of high performance and reasonable consistency, `lavd-amp-v4` may still be preferred in scenarios where frame smoothness is paramount.