Top runs:

• Highest FPS: bore with an average FPS significantly higher than other runs, offering an enhanced performance.
• Smoothest FPS: lavd displaying the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS, providing the most consistent frame rates.
• Best overall: bore as it not only has the highest FPS but also maintains a relatively low variance in FPS, balancing between performance and consistency.

Issues:

• The run using the bpfland scheduler exhibits considerably lower FPS, with an average FPS notably lower than other runs. Additionally, the FPS variance is higher, leading to inconsistent frame rates.
• Another noticeable discrepancy is the use of a significantly higher swap memory in the run with bore2 scheduler. This is atypical compared to other runs and might indicate suboptimal performance management.

Summary:

This benchmark compares various Rust-based schedulers (bore, bore2, bpfland, lavd, rusty) on a constant hardware setup using CachyOS and performance Linux scheduler. The bore scheduler stands out by delivering the highest average FPS with commendable consistency, making it the best overall choice. The lavd scheduler excels in terms of smoothness, showing the lowest frame rate variance. However, the bpfland scheduler underperforms with a significantly lower average FPS and higher variance, highlighting potential stability issues. The bore2 scheduler also shows unusual high swap usage, which might need further investigation. Overall, the bore scheduler appears to be the most balanced option, providing both high performance and stable frame rates.