# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `bore` with approximately 5% higher mean FPS compared to the others. * **Smoothest FPS**: `rusty` with approximately 25% lower variance and standard deviation in FPS than the others. * **Best overall**: `bore` with the highest FPS and reasonable stability compared to others. # Issues: * The configuration of `rusty` shows a lower mean FPS by about 10% while it uses the same hardware and software. * `bore2` and some other runs display lower GPU use and power efficiency compared to `bore`, it results in lower FPS by about 5% more fluctuation in frame times. # Summary From the benchmark data, it is clear that different `rust` kernel schedulers impact the performance of the same hardware configuration on `CachyOS`. The `bore` scheduler consistently delivers top FPS performance while maintaining an acceptable level of smoothness and stability. In contrast, the `rusty` scheduler is highly stable, exhibiting the lowest variability, but at the cost of significantly reduced FPS. On average, `bore` offers the best combination of high FPS and moderate stability, making it the most balanced option for optimized performance.