Submitted 7 months ago by cuysaurus
Label | OS | GPU | CPU | RAM | OS specific |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
bore | CachyOS | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | Intel Core i5-10600K CPU @ 4.10GHz | 17 GB | 6.10.5-2-cachyos performance |
bore2 | CachyOS | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | Intel Core i5-10600K CPU @ 4.10GHz | 17 GB | 6.10.5-2-cachyos performance |
bpfland | CachyOS | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | Intel Core i5-10600K CPU @ 4.10GHz | 17 GB | 6.10.5-2-cachyos performance |
lavd | CachyOS | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | Intel Core i5-10600K CPU @ 4.10GHz | 17 GB | 6.10.5-2-cachyos performance |
rustland | CachyOS | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | Intel Core i5-10600K CPU @ 4.10GHz | 17 GB | 6.10.5-2-cachyos performance |
rusty | CachyOS | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | Intel Core i5-10600K CPU @ 4.10GHz | 17 GB | 6.10.5-2-cachyos performance |
bore
with approximately 5% higher mean FPS compared to the others.rusty
with approximately 25% lower variance and standard deviation in FPS than the others.bore
with the highest FPS and reasonable stability compared to others.rusty
shows a lower mean FPS by about 10% while it uses the same hardware and software.bore2
and some other runs display lower GPU use and power efficiency compared to bore
, it results in lower FPS by about 5% more fluctuation in frame times.From the benchmark data, it is clear that different rust
kernel schedulers impact the performance of the same hardware configuration on CachyOS
. The bore
scheduler consistently delivers top FPS performance while maintaining an acceptable level of smoothness and stability. In contrast, the rusty
scheduler is highly stable, exhibiting the lowest variability, but at the cost of significantly reduced FPS. On average, bore
offers the best combination of high FPS and moderate stability, making it the most balanced option for optimized performance.