# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `lavd`. It has the highest mean FPS, exceeding the other run by approximately 8%. * **Smoothest FPS**: `lavd`. It has the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS, indicating the most stable performance. * **Best overall**: `lavd`. Due to the combination of the highest average FPS and the smoothest frame rates, this run offers the best overall performance. # Issues: * The `bpfland-next` setup shows significantly worse FPS performance, with an approximately 7% lower average FPS compared to the `lavd` setup. * The FPS stability with `bpfland-next` is considerably worse, with an approximately 40% higher standard deviation and a much higher variance. # Summary The benchmark comparison between the two scheduling strategies, `lavd` and `bpfland-next`, on the same hardware and operating system shows that the `lavd` setup significantly outperforms `bpfland-next` in terms of both average FPS and FPS stability. While both runs use the same underlying hardware and operating system, the `lavd` scheduler provides a near 8% boost in average FPS and maintains a much more consistent frame rate, making it the superior choice for this specific benchmark.