Benchmark #25

Download
CarX Drift Racing Online: BPFLAND vs BORE

This game is running a replay loop of the same race, so it never changes Game resolution set at 720p all low to increase cpu usage Twitch stream 1080p60 running on the background also tried different maximum slices for bpfland

Submitted 4 months ago by aarrayy

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
bore-twitch Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor 12 GB 6.10.0-rc6-1-cachyos-rc-lto
bpfland-100-twitch Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor 12 GB 6.10.0-rc6-1-cachyos-rc-lto
bpfland-5000-twitch Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor 12 GB 6.10.0-rc6-1-cachyos-rc-lto
bpfland-20000-twitch Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor 12 GB 6.10.0-rc6-1-cachyos-rc-lto
bpfland-50000-twitch Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon R7 370 Series (RADV PITCAIRN) AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor 12 GB 6.10.0-rc6-1-cachyos-rc-lto
# Top runs - `bpfland-50000-twitch` has the **Highest FPS** with an average FPS approximately 3% higher than the rest. - `bpfland-100-twitch` has the **Smoothest FPS**, exhibiting the lowest variance in FPS by about 15% compared to the others. - `bpfland-100-twitch` is the **Best overall**, offering a balance between high FPS (second highest overall) and smooth performance (lowest std.dev). # Issues - `bore-twitch` performance is significantly worse with FPS being approximately 3% lower and the highest variance among all runs. # Summary In this benchmark of CarX Drift Racing Online, all five runs used similar hardware and software settings. `bpfland-50000-twitch` delivered the highest average FPS, while `bpfland-100-twitch` provided the most stable performance. `bore-twitch` underperformed significantly with lower average FPS and higher variance compared to the others; this might be attributed to inconsistencies in load management or resource allocation. Other runs, including `bpfland-20000-twitch` and `bpfland-5000-twitch`, showed performance within an acceptable range, but `bpfland-100-twitch` stood out as the best overall due to its optimal balance of high FPS and stability.